Monthly Archive for August, 2006

Page 2 of 2

Relationship viability

Relationships, especially intimate relationships, provide one of the greatest opportunities for us to learn and grow. For some this takes on a spiritual dimension, whether just in the sense of there being the spiritual bonding advocated by orthodox religion or through those relationships offering us a great context within which to build towards our spiritual objectives (a la Zukav or A Course in Miracles).

I have observed that our appreciation and understand for another person can be slanted in at least three ways:

  1. We can see people as they are,
  2. We can see people as they could be, and
  3. We can see people as they are not.

I’d guess that these are largely mutually exclusive within a specific context, though across a relationship they may vary. Their importance would probably vary by the stage of the relationship, and are likely to be impacted by the age and maturity of the parties.

Having done an MBA, perhaps I should find a way to create a two-by-two matrix. With that in mind, perhaps I could create an axis for “present” and another for “future”, with an either discrete or continuous scale for each. This would yield the following four alternatives:

  1. Future accurate, Present accurate
    We see them as they are and how they will be.
  2. Future accurate, Present inaccurate
    We understand where they are going, but don’t understand them today.
  3. Future inaccurate, Present accurate
    We see them as they are now, but don’t understand who they will be in the future.
  4. Future inaccurate, Present inaccurate
    We misunderstand who they are today and don’t understand where they are going.

Great relationships in the short term come from appreciating and valuing that other person in the short term… but a sustainable relationship demands congruence of values, purpose and direction in the longer term. This is always difficult – especially when we are young – and getting it wrong can be very expensive.

When I started dating one girl, we shared a lot in common. We had very similar values, intended a similar future and came from a similar background. After dating for a time we realised that our intentions had diverged – we had grown in different directions. We could characterise that as being “Accurate present, Inaccurate future”. This contrasted with another girl, where we shared a common vision for the future, but her impression of me was inaccurate.

To an extent, we see who we are. When we appreciate and notice anger and violence, we tend to bring that into our lives; when we notice peace, love and openness, we likewise tend to bring that into our lives and bring that out in those around us.

Ultimately, I don’t believe that love isn’t blind so much as it has a set of transition lenses on that gradually get lighter as the intensity of time, experience and openness with that other person forces us to face the truth.

Relationship viability

Relationships, especially intimate relationships, provide one of the greatest opportunities for us to learn and grow. For some this takes on a spiritual dimension, whether just in the sense of there being the spiritual bonding advocated by orthodox religion or through those relationships offering us a great context within which to build towards our spiritual objectives (a la Zukav or A Course in Miracles).

I have observed that our appreciation and understand for another person can be slanted in at least three ways:

  1. We can see people as they are,
  2. We can see people as they could be, and
  3. We can see people as they are not.

I’d guess that these are largely mutually exclusive within a specific context, though across a relationship they may vary. Their importance would probably vary by the stage of the relationship, and are likely to be impacted by the age and maturity of the parties.

Having done an MBA, perhaps I should find a way to create a two-by-two matrix. With that in mind, perhaps I could create an axis for “present” and another for “future”, with an either discrete or continuous scale for each. This would yield the following four alternatives:

  1. Future accurate, Present accurate
    We see them as they are and how they will be.
  2. Future accurate, Present inaccurate
    We understand where they are going, but don’t understand them today.
  3. Future inaccurate, Present accurate
    We see them as they are now, but don’t understand who they will be in the future.
  4. Future inaccurate, Present inaccurate
    We misunderstand who they are today and don’t understand where they are going.

Great relationships in the short term come from appreciating and valuing that other person in the short term… but a sustainable relationship demands congruence of values, purpose and direction in the longer term. This is always difficult – especially when we are young – and getting it wrong can be very expensive.

When I started dating ‘Maree’, we shared a lot in common. We had very similar values, intended a similar future and came from a similar background. After dating for a time we realised that our intentions had diverged – we had grown in different directions. We could characterise that as being “Accurate present, Inaccurate future”. This contrasted with ‘Jane’: we shared a common vision for the future, but her impression of me was inaccurate.

To an extent, we see who we are. When we appreciate and notice anger and violence, we tend to bring that into our lives; when we notice peace, love and openness, we likewise tend to bring that into our lives and bring that out in those around us.

Ultimately, I don’t believe that love isn’t blind so much as it has a set of transition lenses on that gradually get lighter as the intensity of time, experience and openness with that other person forces us to face the truth.

More really cool stuff in the news

As I said a few days ago, I really love Tom Peters’ Wire Service… there’s just so much cool stuff happening in the world, it’s tough trying to keep on top of everything, but this is a great help. Just posted to the site in the past 24 hours or so are the following articles that I think are really cool…

  • Moguls of New Media in the Wall Street Journal – how ordinary people are building HUGE networks across the new media, and what that means for all of us…
  • Business model innovation is the toughest type, as Kodak is discovering in Business Week…
  • Why ‘Social media’ – where we talk about what’s hot and what’s not ourselves rather than being the passive recipients of information from the ‘media’ – is a far more powerful form of communication than the old media that we’re used to, with a story on yelp.com
  • FastCompany’s thoughts on blogging and women taken from the BlogHer06…
  • How to build congruence in a company branding (hell for ANYTHING – from a Church to a community group) we need to build that brand from the inside
  • The Nike Stanford Business School… Nike’s founder has just dumped $105m for a new campus! With many of my friends having or doing MBAs, while others criticise them, here’s another reminder that there might just be something of value in hanging around the odd lump of sandstone for a little while. At least there was when Philip Knight did his back in 1962!

I’m no expert in most of this stuff… but it seems just too fascinating and cool to ignore!

Speaking of business schools, I’ve been told that a head of the UQ business school said as an excuse for the low quality of lecturers on campus (I thought that they were okay but oh well), that “We’re no Harvard”. If this is true I am embarrassed to think that such a weak cop-out might ever be uttered from any one’s mouth, never mind the man responsible for the UQ Business School. If you want to be great, you have to first think great… mediocrity will just come along in its own good time, but with greatness or anything else that you actually want to create rather than just hope for, the heart must first by made to conceive before the eyes will be permitted to discover.

Australia does not have the luxury of superior talent anymore. Nor do we have the luxury of superior access to capital or a stable political structure. China, India and the rest of the world is developing fast and they will take jobs, money and power wherever it might be available. The only way that we can retain strength is if we value what we have and build upon it for future generations. Mediocrity is stealing from our grandchildren.

There is too much information to have it all… how are you figuring out what you need and what you don’t?




-->